Portal de Alhama de Murcia
www.portaldealhama.com
The regular plenary session of August was a quiet city, wearing the most points have been processed.
In its fourth point he was appointed Lali Carrillo as representative of the Urban Conservation Authority Condado de Alhama.
In the year and a half that this government team leads to the front of the consistory have not attended the meetings that the urban entity every three months, that is to say, we had no municipal representative to the Board of Directors although it is established that councilman Councilwoman planning or whoever holds these functions.
Another point that was full was to commence the process that the City remains as majority shareholder Industrialhama because now is the INFO has the greatest number of shares.
At this point we vote in favor because it is the beginning of the proceedings, but warned that this should be studied carefully.
At present Industrialhama enjoys a good economic health, so it may be interesting for this council made with 51% of the shares to the detriment of INFO would stay with 49% of them.
The downside could be that by being the City Council in a dominant position and considering that Industrialhama is within the real estate sector can be a mismatch at certain times in the municipal budget by the ups and downs of the sector, as it would have to include them within them, so that in case there should be lost also assume.
As to the appeal filed by Mr. Vicente Rubio Navarro say that it is a request that is not new, coming from previous years and was aware that this group since he held the Department of staff in the previous legislature.
Vincent asks what is that all positions MTN classified in Group C1 are changed and the B group are reclassified by matching titles: the specialist with the Higher Technical (Law 14/1970) Technical.
As the report says that equalization Personnel is taken into account when participating in selection processes seats / posts, but matching not supposed to positions classified as C1 they become the group B.
Is no longer a Judgment (No. 61/2016) by the same official request in this petition is dismissed, arguing that "at no time adapting legislation emerges groups attending the degree of q occupy The squares".
Therefore the administrative appeal by D. Vicente Rubio has no basis to exist this sentence.
In the other appeal by José Clares Martinez this is dissatisfied, as it did in the written statement to the RPT, for not having been revised his position as sergeant in the RPT and yes the rest of Police Officers Local where there has been an adjustment in the specific supplement.
The dismissal of the appeal is based on the official who requested not make shifts, thing that we do not fully agree because there are positions of Police Officers that itself has been revised them that specific supplement, pay or not rotating shifts (Police tutor; PIT, notifiers and maintenance agents ...)
As we said in the final approval of the RPT, we favor that officials claim what they consider legitimate and beneficial according to their position and their duties and are not entirely agree with the arguments used by the government team for dismiss this appeal.
Therefore, our vote was abstention.
In question and answer criticize not we have informed the political groups on the draft cover Square Abastos, also asked if he had enjoyed an architect of the city for the development of the project and we have verified that he has made a minor contract.
In our group we wish that at least you had given participation professionals there in Alhama.
Source: PP Alhama de Murcia
Privacy policy
- Legal notice
- Cookies