Portal de Alhama de Murcia
www.portaldealhama.com
Pozo Alimentación presented three 40% bonus proposals from ICIO.
These three points were dealt with together and the Popular Party repeated the lack of security and diligence with which this government team with Mr. Conesa to the front is dealing with companies.
The company initially requested a bonus of 40% for the ordinance of 2015 and the 30% for promotion of employment in 2016, because the administrators did not know which ordinance to accept given the legal vacuum caused by This government team.
The popular party warned of the possible effects that this legal vacuum would have and the mayor mayor tried to alarmist and to miss the truth.
In the Plenary Ordinary last August, they had to reconsider and give us the reason, since in its Fifth Point, a modification of the ICIO ordinance was requested where the government team recognized the existence of a "Normative Void" and Intended to approve the 40% bonus retroactively to applications submitted before July 15 of this year, using the ordinance of 2015.
At this November Plenary, the mayor wanted us to approve an ICIO bonus initiated during the regulatory vacuum caused by his government team and also promising that the company will withdraw the administrative resources that it has put against this council, which we also warn you last year.
In this way, Mr. Mayor wants the other political groups to help him to correct his mistakes.
From the Popular Party we want to express that we agree to help companies to install and grow in our municipality, generating jobs and wealth.
However, we can not agree that decisions are made to benefit companies depending on the pressure they make to this council, to the detriment of others who have no capacity to act in this regard.
In spite of all the above, we voted to abstain from obstructing the procedure and to give way to an unfortunate situation that has been generated by its disastrous management.
Moreover, Plenary Ordinary for the month of November was a quiet plenary, except for the situation of anger manifested by the UI spokesman when we disregarded two motions that had presented and that in principle we were going to support.
However, after not respecting what was said in the Information Commissions regarding the points of the resolution, not development, we had to leave because they do not conform to what was agreed between all groups.
One of them dealt with the Internment Centers for Refugees.
This motion had already been presented to the Regional Assembly by the PODEMOS Parliamentary Group and was widely debated, in which the Popular Party made clear its position on the need for these centers to exist in the absence of another better model.
These installations exist in several countries of the European Union, complying with the EU Directive 2008/115, and can not be closed without knowing what to do with users of the same, as long as no viable alternatives are found.
The income of foreigners in the Spanish CIES are made with all procedural guarantees;
In the art.
2 of the internal rules of procedure of the CIE, it is said that no one can be interned in any center without a judicial resolution that so agrees;
That is to say, the foreigner goes to an appearance before the examining judge, with the presence of a lawyer, the Public Prosecutor, the Judicial Secretary, and if necessary, with a translator.
In addition, the car that establishes its income is appealed through a recourse.
Above all, there is the dignity and respect for the rights of people who, by some circumstances or others make use of these facilities, although everything can be improved and work in that direction.
The other motion of discrepancy was the request for maintenance and maintenance of the channel in the municipality of Alhama by Confederación Hidrográfica del Segura.
In this motion we agreed on the approach and development, but a point was added in which "the Confederation was required to delimit the course of the ramblas", so we had to clear ourselves because it does not benefit us at all and Can be a problem if Confederation ever decided to execute it;
As everybody knows, in Alhama as in the whole region, the limits established in the riverbeds, which are "the natural channel plus one hundred meters of police that have a restricted use" have not been respected, You can build, plus you have restrictions for some crops.
In Alhama there are numerous houses that are of illegal form and could bring consequences for this consistory unnecessary since they are not our competition.
A joint motion by all municipal groups was also made as a manifesto on the 25th International Day on Gender Violence.
Source: PP Alhama de Murcia
Privacy policy
- Legal notice
- Cookies