Portal de Alhama de Murcia
www.portaldealhama.com
[Rating regular plenary September 26, 2013.
IU-green Alhama de Murcia]
As point 6 will be raised by the Municipal Government's claim estimation of Repsol and the dismissal of the appeal filed by Ecologists in Action of the region of Murcia to dispute the final approval of the Special Plan "Paramount" in its modified version , which took place last May in a special session.
First from IU-Greens reiterate that we are not against this or any other project that is installed in Alhama, and it is our duty as councilors to ensure respect for the law and the general interests of citizens, and that the only justification for this extraordinary and urgent full on May 9, when he published the full agreement two months later, was the imperative of our burst Mayor photo with Samper and the Chief Cruz.
Since 2010, we've been hearing about the project Paramount Alhama several amendments, and the relentless pursuit of investors throughout the planet, Mr. Samper and our Chief Cruz, without even know who supports it financially.
The Municipal IU-Greens, and in January, following several judgments that override the decision of the Government decree Valcárcel 11,000 hectares deprotecting, we proposed a motion on its impact on our urban zoning and restitution of legality by the Regional Government, in compliance with the judgments.
The mayor has not seen fit to include it in any plenary.
This is a question that IU-Greens consider fundamental, and found no clear answer written reports so far, and that bypass rule on whether part of the lands are within the protected land.
For IU-Greens, in 1985 and 1992, it wisely chose the protection of natural spaces considering the general interest of Murcia.
It seems unquestionable, as is repeated in many of the reports, that "revived" Special Plan Sierra Carrascoy and port, both to define the uses in his "Respect Strip" to determine the current boundaries of space protected, and whether or not to use and generates increased buildability.
It seems unseemly Regional government action, which after more than nine months since the decision became public that his decree unconstitutional in 2005, in a "tortuous", this shirking their responsibility in the effective enforcement of the judgment, restoring the law to which obliges the Constitutional Court.
However, it sends the "hot potato" to the City Council for a ruling by approving the Partial Plan Paramount.
Regarding Motions submitted by IU-Greens, which refers to military intervention in Syria, expressing solidarity with the Syrian people, the commitment to the diplomatic channels, the need to destroy the entire arsenal of weapons of mass mass (atomic, bacteriological and chemical) worldwide, an independent inquiry to carry out an impartial verification of the use of chemical weapons against Syrian civilians and military nonintervention Spain.
In the second motion, it was intended that since the House is requested withdrawal of LOMCE because it is a law imposed, not previously discussed or been taken into account when teachers or the school community and to educational research.
It also rejects the disproportionate rise in rates and cutting scholarships, the creation of a rescue fund to cover the cost of unpaid taxes, and show solidarity with all teachers.
For IU-Greens is a class act, immoral, egalitarian, segregationist, indoctrinating, is a law UNFAIR.
As support called for a general strike scheduled for educational October 24.
Source: IU-verdes Alhama de Murcia
Privacy policy
- Legal notice
- Cookies