murcia

Portal de Alhama de Murcia

www.portaldealhama.com

Alhama de Murcia - SpanishAlhama de Murcia - English
detail of Alhama de Murcia

 

Rating UDeRM September plenary Alhama de Murcia (30/09/2008)

Article submitted by Angel Cánovas, municipal spokesman UDeRM:

Of disappointing we could tick the rating that our group makes the final plenary meeting of our council, which sums up to the clear lack of direction and coordination of ideological deviation PPSOE that governs us.

For starters, despite including no less than sixteen points in the order of the day and end after three in the morning, indicating a lack of capacity of our alderman to lead and organize a plenary session, despite It was not included in this order the only point a clear need for the time as was the Works and Services Plan for this year and surprise for our group was out for an extraordinary plenary session, knowing that on 20 this October is the deadline for submission to the CAAC, will forecast.

Moreover, one surprising result of discussions that took place you in that session.

Starting Urbanism, and his usual planning agreements relating to macro developments, the Socialist councilor, who no longer know where to go, now argue that the Special Infrastructure Plan has been approved by the mayor unilaterally by decree, without further meeting or explanation the opposition groups will meet for a longer, when we are talking about more than thirteen million m2 that are allowed to develop through agreements, it will take a strategic review of regional impact, but we already have pledged to slice up and approve a partial plan is unknown.

Turns out in this plan are no longer the macro developments, and then ask that how to calculate and determine the necessary infrastructure, as according to the council itself may have changed, another appear ... as if they were pawns in Parcheesi, and to our questions, no answers.

Misinformation seems worse in the first amendment to the General Plan, but is not finally approved it, and still shows his displeasure councilman who want to know what projects are in the central and because we do not agree with the ill-fated acquisition of a ores garden, great for the seller but abusive, in our view, to the council, which spends the money of all.

Of pathetic performance might call the environmental council, which after release of the many environmental programs that develop, on the other side the same that all municipalities develop, no more, not one novel contribution in the area, after trying to convince of the benefits of Alhama adhere to the "Cities for Climate", which all share, is cleared, immediately afterwards, without explanation, and with it the whole team of government subsidies to maintain its government itself has been agreed by the local governing body to certain companies reclaiming solar installations.

The first council itself recognizes some bonuses, and the requeriere year later to pay what in his day he tempered.

Can you make more errors?

The image of this council will be seriously touched, because companies understand that this council is not serious, after giving certain bonuses, then instead of debug errors in the commission, they are claiming, that forgetting that it was the council which convinced these companies to settle in our municipality is under a number of facilities that are now shown poisoned chalice and leaves it defenseless to these companies.

What company will install from now and with this precedent in Alhama?

We will be the only city of Murcia which does not subsidize these businesses would have to see what would the Minister Sebastian if he returned to Alhama, yes to the picture is not missed.

No less ridiculous was the performance of our council meeting of finance, far from providing answers to questions you did the different groups were offended because he says that we highlight the obvious, do not know at this stage nor the names of the items fateful budget he submitted, and whose mistakes, as evidenced by this group, now manifest before plummeting forecasts fallacy supporting this budget.

Once again showed not know what leads up to, or able to answer simple questions, which, moreover, did the allegedly is responsible for the council of finance, as always throwing the blame on the "technical."

Finally, with the worst performance on record in this House, the popular spokesman and Councillor for Culture, still we wonder who you represent if not yourself.

Do not hesitate to throw soil management People's Party of the outgoing legislature, management gave the other side to victory in the 2007 elections, not realizing that he represents that group and that to date no can say you've done not one thing that is not playing the program that ran in the previous term of his predecessor, albeit with a disastrous level of hearing, perhaps because of it, or you have to blame us?.

This council believes that independent and should forget that only a party, and that while his party approved type motions (motion of the canon, Castilian, revenues of local governments ...) in all municipalities wherever governs, Alhama and because they believe different shapes and label the motions at will, and if not accepted as amended, being kind to the proposal, approved, which enraged college kid, by the Local Government Board, and then go to your party Regional getting medals, irony.

Source: UDeRM de Alhama de Murcia

Notice
UNE-EN ISO 9001:2000 - ER-0131/2006 © 2019 Alamo Networks S.L. - C/Alamo 8, 30850 Totana (Murcia) Privacy policy - Legal notice Región de Murcia
Este sitio web utiliza cookies para facilitar y mejorar la navegación. Si continúas navegando, consideramos que aceptas su uso. Más información