Ecologistas en Acción has been fighting the unsustainable "Paramount Theme Park" project, sponsored by PREMURSA "Proyectos Emblemáticos Murcianos SA" (currently "Premursa Theme-Park SA").
What led in the day to the environmental organization to raise a contentious administrative procedure against the Plenary Agreement of the City of Alhama de Murcia of September 12, 2013, which approved in a final form the Special Plan of Management of the Tourism-Recreation Complex " Paramount Theme Park "(Modified).
Among the arguments put forward by Ecologistas en Acción is the legal consequence of another important sentence obtained thanks to the work of this organization: the Judgment of the Plenum of the Constitutional Court nº 234/2012 of December 13, 2012, expressly declaring Unconstitutional and null and void Additional Provision Eight of Legislative Decree 1/2005, of June 10, approving the consolidated text of the Land Law of the Region.
This judgment of the Constitutional Court, they explain, supposed that the limits of the Protected Natural Areas included in Law 4/1992 would again conform to those that were originally approved, since the modification of these limits introduced at the last minute and in a paragraph with That famous Eighth Additional Provision in the Law of the Land of the Region of Murcia, approved by the government of the then president Valcárcel, and that sought to unprotect spaces with high Ubanistic interest in the real estate bubble, was clearly unconstitutional, as this organization warned.
The ruling of the Constitutional Court, which took eleven years to pronounce, occurred while the project was underway for the "Paramount Theme Park", which invaded the original area of ​​the Carrascoy and El Valle Regional Park in 21% of its area. Which is not compatible with such protection, as already denounced by the environmental organization.
For this reason, Ecologistas en Acción welcomes this decision of the Superior Court of Justice of Murcia, which annuls this unsustainable project "Theme Park within a Protected Natural Space.
In addition, they again urge the Regional Government not to delay further in time the adequacy of all Urban Plans and Standards that are still affected by this ruling and that this organization has claimed to be revised and corrected ex officio by the Administration Regional, as required by current legislation, to avoid current legal insecurity, which is not good for business interests, or for the protection of the environment.
Source: Ecologistas en Acción