Portal de Alhama de Murcia
www.portaldealhama.com
UdRM note from Alhama de Murcia:
After two months, a new heart, a new fiasco for those who believe in a full council discusses the issues affecting their interests, a repeated two-month break from our team of government, that in the absence of ideas, projects and new proposals, presents an agenda with only two points, have not even had time to prepare the minutes of the previous meeting for the month of July.
Of the two points, first, the new ordinance of public roads in our town, a crude and literal copy of the ordinance from another municipality, and it is embarrassing to hear the planning councilor used to say that many texts of other ordinances to present itself to the full, when we presented is a verbatim copy of the Order of Pinto, with the only change to include clauses in the two points that were agreed in full in May, this is the level of this team of government, the copy and paste the work done in other municipalities, but what warmed the head, if they charge the same?.
A little modesty might have, especially considering that the council takes less earn 1,800 euros a month to clean our pockets, it's been two months since the last full, that so far this year the groups opposition have submitted more proposals, the team of government, and in this case because the council that both works, the planning councilor earns 3,500 euros a month, and two double pay per year for presenting the full verbatim copying of another municipality, and says it is an adaptation.
Should the council find in the dictionary of the RAE the difference between copying and adaptation, is far, we assure you.
An ordinance that is exposed to the public and we fear that insurance will not have a quarter of the advertising that is building the penultimate frenzy of our mayor, the swearing of allegiance.
The second point, ratification, ie, no debate about it, I have approved the local governing body, that the only thing the opposition groups can provide either a yes or no, depressing the ability of those fleeing the debate.
Our group at the second point abstained because we believe that giving permission to be built "recreational facilities" as he calls the planning councilor, housing for all citizens, in the vicinity of people who were qualified for it zoned as developable land, and as short-term growth of our town, is a decision that has not been sufficiently thought out, because we believe that the significance of this decision can make our PGMO is nonsense.
We say this because of the benefit that may mean for those owners who have estates larger than 5,000 m2 in these areas can build up a house of 50m2 timber or detachable material has not been assessed in this case by the covenant PPSOE the enormous damage that it can be assumed based on the following reasoning:
stop building in these areas, and sectored will undoubtedly a major obstacle for these sectors to develop in the future, because nobody can overlook that once built the "recreational facility" or home, to see who is the bold to say that it removed.
The time gives the reason this type of work become indefinite interim, especially when it comes to housing.
For homeowners who can benefit from this new possibility will be sworn enemies of future developments, as usual, to defend their rights.
in any case one thinks of those other owners who can not use this opportunity to have farms of less than 5,000 m2 space and that they themselves are doomed for life to develop their lands, unable to do anything.
These are the real losers, and the City "is going to compensate for it?
complications that threaten the viability of new sectors, suggest that the city or any private enterprise is doomed to fail in the land development efforts in those sectors where there are several such licensing.
The government team has been unable to get a m2 of land only, or even carry out the already completed, as the dry, mule road, triangle Guadalentín prayco, cotton ... and now approves of what will be an insurmountable obstacle facing the futro.
in no case has raised the lack of infrastructure in these areas, water, electricity, sewer, access, garbage ... which will increase and problems that face our city council should do, because the license to ensure that essential services provided.
This will leave the pocket of all, like everything else.
We could give a thousand arguments, but in any case, despite expressing our opposition in May, we have been taken into account, and lead to full, an issue already approved by them in local government board.
Moreover, the same tone in questions and answers, everything is going to do but swim is done.
And confirms that the Casa de la Marina, nothing at all by the crisis, in celebration, it appears that the councilor said that advance the chupinazo was agreed at a meeting of government and now they do not appear anywhere this agreement, simply because was taken, that the concert is done because the council is risky to not spend money on another scenario, if you spend money at the concert of the best years of our life, all that is, since the rest is private, making ignore what they see as the ombudsman said, to conclude by saying that the reason that the fireworks display will be allocated to the Virgin of Pilar and not the Rosary is because they agreed the council of festivities, throwing balls out.
Mayor to do another project for the headquarters that will never come, and the rest, we are seeing, the neighbors already know this ditty, and come as the months go by and do nothing.
A new example of the lack of this computer program and improvisation from day to day, the only consolation the two news programs that fit this mayor, although the eye, and warned that it would not be so, we must ask second mayor in the next full meaning of his words.
Source: UdRM de Alhama de Murcia
Privacy policy
- Legal notice
- Cookies